
Nature:東亞人群也有至少5-10%的西歐亞成分?
David Reich實驗室昨天新發nature論文解析最早的農民:Genomic insights into the origin of farming in the ancient Near East
We report genome-wide ancient DNA from 44 ancient Near Easterners ranging in time between ~12,000 and 1,400 BCE, from Natufian hunter–gatherers to Bronze Age farmers. We show that the earliest populations of the Near East derived around half their ancestry from a ‘Basal Eurasian’ lineage that had little if any Neanderthal admixture and that separated from other non-African lineages before their separation from each other. The first farmers of the southern Levant (Israel and Jordan) and Zagros Mountains (Iran) were strongly genetically differentiated, and each descended from local hunter–gatherers. By the time of the Bronze Age, these two populations and Anatolian-related farmers had mixed with each other and with the hunter–gatherers of Europe to drastically reduce genetic differentiation. The impact of the Near Eastern farmers extended beyond the Near East: farmers related to those of Anatolia spread westward into Europe; farmers related to those of the Levant spread southward into East Africa; farmers related to those from Iran spread northward into the Eurasian steppe; and people related to both the early farmers of Iran and to the pastoralists of the Eurasian steppe spread eastward into South Asia.
?
爆點在于最后一部分模擬東亞人群里的西歐亞成分:no less than ~5–10% ANE in diverse East Asian groups including Han Chinese,這里的ANE指的是西伯利亞的Mal'ta1,這直接顛覆了我們對史前人群混合的理解,但所用方法、所做假設是否正確就還需要后續驗證。
?
?
?
We report genome-wide ancient DNA from 44 ancient Near Easterners ranging in time between ~12,000 and 1,400 BCE, from Natufian hunter–gatherers to Bronze Age farmers. We show that the earliest populations of the Near East derived around half their ancestry from a ‘Basal Eurasian’ lineage that had little if any Neanderthal admixture and that separated from other non-African lineages before their separation from each other. The first farmers of the southern Levant (Israel and Jordan) and Zagros Mountains (Iran) were strongly genetically differentiated, and each descended from local hunter–gatherers. By the time of the Bronze Age, these two populations and Anatolian-related farmers had mixed with each other and with the hunter–gatherers of Europe to drastically reduce genetic differentiation. The impact of the Near Eastern farmers extended beyond the Near East: farmers related to those of Anatolia spread westward into Europe; farmers related to those of the Levant spread southward into East Africa; farmers related to those from Iran spread northward into the Eurasian steppe; and people related to both the early farmers of Iran and to the pastoralists of the Eurasian steppe spread eastward into South Asia.
?
爆點在于最后一部分模擬東亞人群里的西歐亞成分:no less than ~5–10% ANE in diverse East Asian groups including Han Chinese,這里的ANE指的是西伯利亞的Mal'ta1,這直接顛覆了我們對史前人群混合的理解,但所用方法、所做假設是否正確就還需要后續驗證。
?
?
?
10 個回復
贊同來自:
我之前在微解讀發起過一個和西歐亞淺膚色突變SLC24A5相關的調查,發現具有西歐亞突變類型的比例并不算少。我統計的基因頻率是9.26%,但考慮到是有明顯性狀表現的基因,統計的樣本可能會有偏差,因為淺膚色測這個位點人可能會更多。
恰好在最開始的時候該位點已經有人發起過解讀,雖然當時稱之為“保持蝦頭不黑”之類很奇怪的名字,但卻可以保證數據樣本不具備偏向性。根據那份樣本得出的基因頻率是6.6%,我認為這應該能夠代表該突變在東亞地區的一個平均水平。
鑒于該突變出現的時間可能相對較晚(不早于2萬年),可以提供一個參考。東亞人的西歐亞、中亞成分,主要是來自中亞的ANE成分很可能大都是在兩萬年末次盛冰期結束后融入的,而且很可能是來自于歷史時期的東西方交流。這一點可以在未來通過不同時期的古DNA進行驗證。
贊同來自:
贊同來自:
贊同來自:
本人籍貫3/4重慶, 1/4西北。基本上還是算南方人。
Wegene:
南方漢族 49.37
北方漢族 37.94
藏緬族群 8.21
高山族群 0.71
其他 0.02
東北亞
日本 3.50
其他 0%
其他 0.03
K7b:
East Asian-83.87
Siberian-14.93
South Asian-0.46
Atlantic-Baltic-0.37
West Asian-0.24
Southern-0.12
西域1.20
Geno 2.0
Northeast Asian-56%
Southeast Asia and Oceania-44%
他們中國人的標準樣本東北亞比我多, 而且還有我缺少的中亞和西伯利亞成分。
Family Tree DNA 55% 東北亞 45% 東南亞
23andMe 忘了, 但大概是
99.5% 東亞和北美原住民
96.9% Chinese
0.5% Korean
0.6% Southeast Asian
1.4% Broadly East Asian
0.1% Broadly East Asian and Native American
0.3% European
0.1% 東歐
0.1% 南歐
0.1% 泛歐洲
0.1% 南亞
不到0.1% 中非和南非
濕耳候
喝酒不臉紅
頭發5個SNP里3個直發, 2個卷發
10% Blonde
贊同來自:
贊同來自:
贊同來自:
繩紋人的也有了。。。
贊同來自:
The Neolithic in Northeast Asia in light of a 7,700 year-old genome???
俄朝邊境的2例古dna,應該是通古斯人的直系祖先了“These hunter-gatherers are genetically most similar to geographically close populations from the Amur Basin, in particular the Ulchi, implying a high level of continuity in this region over most of the Holocene.”
沒有全文,應該還沒有正式發表在期刊上,不知能否提前看到。。。
這個數據應該可以解決韓國祖源的問題。。。
?
http://smbe-2016.p.asnevents.com.au/days/2016-07-04/abstract/34323
贊同來自:
贊同來自:
要回復問題請先登錄或注冊